Lucid lts-backport-maverick Pull request

[Leann Ogasawara]

On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 16:57 -0400, Tim Gardner wrote:
> On 11/01/2010 03:56 PM, Leann Ogasawara wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 13:58 -0400, Tim Gardner wrote:
> >> On 11/01/2010 01:26 PM, Leann Ogasawara wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 14:42 -0600, Tim Gardner wrote:
> >>>> The following changes since commit e5bc81156355bc8203a2fb389447f99007ccf0f9:
> >>>>     Brad Figg (1):
> >>>>           UBUNTU: Ubuntu-2.6.35-23.36
> >>>>
> >>>> are available in the git repository at:
> >>>>
> >>>>     git://kernel.ubuntu.com/rtg/ubuntu-lucid.git lts-backport-maverick
> >>>
> >>> Despite the Subject and above git repo indicating this should be applied
> >>> to the Lucid repo, it seems Lucid already has an lts-backport-maverick
> >>> branch.  Looking at the actual patches in the pull request, it seems the
> >>> patches apply to Maverick?  Is my understanding correct?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Leann
> >>
> >> It's not really clear from the pull request I guess, but this really
> >> does apply to the lts-backports-maverick branch in Lucid (unless I've
> >> really messed something up).
> >
> > Hrm, I can't seem to get this to apply cleanly to the current Lucid
> > lts-backport-maverick branch.  The following two commits are already at
> > the tip of the current Lucid lts-backport-maverick branch:
> >
> > d295edc9c59595a15affce38d93e8f5d4ac14249 UBUNTU: Ubuntu-lts-2.6.35-22.34
> > 9afeecbc176baaa5fabce2f155f6a488c3cca1a6 UBUNTU: [Config] Created LTS backport branch
> >
> > So it seems something isn't quite right with the pull request as it's
> > again trying to create the LTS backport branch which already exists.  Or
> > are you expecting a hard reset to FETCH_HEAD instead?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Leann
> >
> 
> Oh, right. You've pointed out a couple of deficiencies (or unwitting 
> assumptions I've made). This really isn't a merge or pull request, 
> rather you'll need to reset hard to FETCH_HEAD since this branch is 
> always a total rebase.

Ack.  Looks good to me then.

Acked-by: Leann Ogasawara <leann.ogasawara at canonical.com>