USBFS Bugfix
Stefan Bader
stefan.bader at canonical.com
Wed Mar 24 16:39:53 UTC 2010
Chase Douglas wrote:
> Hi Markus,
>
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Markus Rechberger
> <mrechberger at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> on IRC I was recommended to submit this information to the mailinglist
>>
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/544527
>
> The bug itself doesn't list much information. It basically says "usbfs
> is broken." We need some proof of what is going wrong, preferably
> something that can be tested when a fix is available.
>
>> Here's a better solution. In theory we could copy just the individual
>> packets from within the transfer buffer, but that would probably take
>> longer than simply copying the whole buffer.
>>
>> (This was a little hasty; I haven't even compile-tested the patch.
>> Some small fixes may be needed.)
>
> The general procedure for fixes to reach Ubuntu is to have them sent
> upstream and be included in the mainline linux, and then to have the
> fix read the -stable tree. We then pull patches from the -stable tree
> for inclusion in Ubuntu.
>
> If you can show that a specific patch has been found to fix an issue
> in Ubuntu and it has been accepted upstream by the maintainers of the
> kernel subsystem this impacts, we may be able to accept the patch as a
> pre-stable fix, in anticipation that it will be accepted into the
> -stable tree in the future.
>
> What is the origin of this patch? Is it from upstream somewhere? A
> commit hash from linux-2.6 or some other tree would be very helpful.
>
>> Alan Stern
>>
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This patch fixes a bug in the way isochronous input data is returned
>> to userspace for usbfs transfers. The entire buffer must be copied,
>> not just the first actual_length bytes, because the individual packets
>> will be discontiguous if any of them are short.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern at rowland.harvard.edu>
>> CC: stable <stable at kernel.org>
>>
>> ---
>> Index: usb-2.6/drivers/usb/core/devio.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- usb-2.6.orig/drivers/usb/core/devio.c
>> +++ usb-2.6/drivers/usb/core/devio.c
>> @@ -1176,6 +1176,13 @@ static int proc_do_submiturb(struct dev_
>> free_async(as);
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> }
>> + /* Isochronous input data may end up being discontiguous
>> + * if some of the packets are short. Clear the buffer so
>> + * that the gaps don't leak kernel data to userspace.
>> + */
>> + if (is_in && uurb->type == USBDEVFS_URB_TYPE_ISO)
>> + memset(as->urb->transfer_buffer, 0,
>> + uurb->buffer_length);
>> }
>> as->urb->dev = ps->dev;
>> as->urb->pipe = (uurb->type << 30) |
>> @@ -1312,10 +1319,14 @@ static int processcompl(struct async *as
>> void __user *addr = as->userurb;
>> unsigned int i;
>>
>> - if (as->userbuffer && urb->actual_length)
>> - if (copy_to_user(as->userbuffer, urb->transfer_buffer,
>> - urb->actual_length))
>> + if (as->userbuffer && urb->actual_length) {
>> + if (urb->number_of_packets > 0) /* Isochronous */
>> + i = urb->transfer_buffer_length;
>> + else /* Non-Isoc */
>> + i = urb->actual_length;
>> + if (copy_to_user(as->userbuffer, urb->transfer_buffer, i))
>> goto err_out;
>> + }
>> if (put_user(as->status, &userurb->status))
>> goto err_out;
>> if (put_user(urb->actual_length, &userurb->actual_length))
>>
>> It would be nice if this patch could go into the ubuntu lucid kernel
>> as soon as possible.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Markus
>
> -- Chase
>
Well it seems to come from Alan Stern and be cc'ed to stable. So it should/would
come from there. But I have not seen it in the queue, yet. But it is in upstream:
commit 7152b592593b9d48b33f8997b1dfd6df9143f7ec
Author: Alan Stern <stern at rowland.harvard.edu>
Date: Sat Mar 6 15:04:03 2010 -0500
USB: fix usbfs regression
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list