[PATCH 0/2] Expose the DRM version

Andy Whitcroft apw at canonical.com
Mon Mar 15 12:58:55 UTC 2010

On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 06:55:15AM -0600, Tim Gardner wrote:

> There have been cases in the past when not all stable updates have
> been applied, so it might be a bit disingenuous to advertise a
> stable updates realese number. That being said, I'm still in favor
> since its going to be pretty close. Keeping track of the DRM release
> state is also gonna be a pain. Is the plan to watch for any .33
> stable kernel updates that affect DRM and update the DRM version
> number accordingly, e.g. drm33.x ?
> Acked-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner at canonical.com>

Yeah the plan is that the drm33.y would match the v2.6.33.y tree we are
tracking and pulling drm updates only from.


More information about the kernel-team mailing list