apport appears broken in latest updates/dailies
Jeremy Foshee
jeremy.foshee at canonical.com
Sun Mar 14 23:36:37 UTC 2010
On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 16:15 -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 10:53:54AM +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 03:16:36AM -0400, Jeremy Foshee wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 18:05 -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 08:35:25PM -0500, Jeremy Foshee wrote:
> > > > > Folks,
> > > > > I'm not saying it is in-fact broken, but I have seen an inordinate
> > > > > amount of bug reporters having problems reporting and/or collecting
> > > > > logging for bugs.
> > > >
> > > > Got an example?
> > >
> > > Here is a recent example of what folks have been seeing.
> > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408991
> > > Comment #3.
> >
> > I thought the -p was no longer required on Karmic? and later? Looks
> > like its no longer supported. apport is supposed to self classify the
> > parameters these days, package or bug #.
This has not been my understanding in Karmic, not have I seen any error
like the one being mentioned in all of the reports. we have been asking
for the command with -p and only recently began seeing these problems.
>
> Pitti, probably would be a good idea even if -p is now unneeded, to
> leave it supported as a depricated option for the period of one release
> cycle.
>
> (This is probably a good general rule for apport, to give time to get
> docs and tools updated. I recall we went through this once before with
> ubuntu-bug.)
Here is another description of behavior. This time with additional pains
it would seem.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/385372
>
> Bryce
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list