Please review and uploade the trace-cmd package to the NEW queue
Tim Gardner
tim.gardner at canonical.com
Wed Jun 16 15:27:19 UTC 2010
On 06/16/2010 08:09 AM, Chase Douglas wrote:
> Tim,
>
> I've packaged up the trace-cmd and kernelshark programs, both from a
> single trace-cmd source package. You can find the source package and
> prebuilt amd64 binary packages for testing at
> http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~cndougla/trace-cmd/. As a core-dev and MOTU,
> can you review the package and upload to the NEW queue for Maverick?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Chase
>
>
Well, to begin with _something_ is messed up with the way you have it
packaged:
dget http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~cndougla/trace-cmd/trace-cmd_1.0.2-1.dsc
rtg at lochsa:~/maverick/trace-cmd$ dpkg-source -x *.dsc
gpgv: Signature made Wed 16 Jun 2010 08:15:12 AM MDT using DSA key ID
9F95D10F
gpgv: Can't check signature: public key not found
dpkg-source: warning: failed to verify signature on ./trace-cmd_1.0.2-1.dsc
dpkg-source: error: cannot fstat file ./trace-cmd_1.0.2-1.debian.tar.gz:
No such file or directory
Secondly, I was looking at your packaging repo. If it was me, I'd clone
Rostedt's repo, then add the debian packaging cruft. Its easy enough to
rebase against an upstream source only project. Heck, he might even take
your packaging changes.
Finally, when creating the source package be sure to elide all .git stuff.
dpkg-buildpackage -S -rfakeroot -I.git -I.gitignore -i'\.git.*'
I also would not bother with an orig tarball.
--
Tim Gardner tim.gardner at canonical.com
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list