Lucid pull request, LP494565

[John Johansen]

Tim Gardner wrote:
> Scott Moser wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, Tim Gardner wrote:
>>
>>> John Johansen wrote:
>>>> Tim Gardner wrote:
>>>>> John,
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you work with Scott to make this really solves the initramfs issue?
>>>>>
>>>> Indeed, we had kernels built yesterday, with essentially the same patch and
>>>> the issue has been on determining whether should go into -server and -pae
>>>> or whether we will need another flavour.
>>>>
>>>> john
>>> -pae ? I thought this bug was all about the virtual flavour.
>> Unless I'm mistaken
>>    on amd64, -virtual is subflavour of -server
>>    on i386, -virtual is subflavour of -generic-pae
>>
> 
> Yeah, I'd just forgotten that -virtual was also built for i386. In any
> event, if these config changes are sufficient, then I don't think they
> warrant a separate flavour.
> 
I agree this doesn't really warrant a new flavour unless it causes problems.
There has been some light testing and I have issued a new pull request for
my version of the patches which are pretty much exactly the same except for
they include generic-pae changes.

john