[ubuntu-x] Status of kernel X drivers

Bryce Harrington bryce at canonical.com
Thu Feb 18 18:34:34 UTC 2010


On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:38:07AM -0500, Chase Douglas wrote:
> A second proposal I'd like to make would be integrating some of these drivers 
> into jockey. Right now jockey proposes proprietary, marginally supported drivers 
> for ubuntu. This is similar to lbm in that the drivers provided are not 
> supported to the same level as the default modules provided by linux-image. 
> There are many cases, however, where the lbm drivers may solve issues for ubuntu 
> users. Unfortunately, lbm is not really advertised anywhere. I believe it would 
> be useful for users to have the option through jockey to install backport 
> modules, with all the disclaimers of level of support. This helps us not only by 
> providing a possibly better experience for end users when lbm fixes their 
> issues, but also through testing. We would be more likely to see bug reports 
> like, "My hardware doesn't work in lucid until I install lbm". We can find and 
> vet individual fixes more easily and integrate them into the linux-image package.
> 
> This would be very useful for cases where the intel drivers in linux-image can't 
> be fixed due to non-trivial backporting of patches, but the updated drivers 
> could still be provided through lbm. Jockey could look for graphics chipsets 
> that we know function better through lbm and then suggest them to the user just 
> like it's done today for proprietary drivers.

That's not a bad idea.  I was wondering myself how we'd expose the
availability of new lbm bits to end users, and this approach seems quite
sensible.  Pitti, what are your thoughts on this proposal?

Bryce




More information about the kernel-team mailing list