[PATCH 0/1] Add .udebs for armel versatile

[Tim Gardner]

Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> We have been asked to provide .udebs for the armel versatile flavour.
>  Apparently this will allow root-stock to be used to deliver these
> kernels which is much simpler than the alternatives.  The following
> patch enabled generation of udebs for those modules already produced.
> 
> 
> As I was making these changes I did wonder why we do not already have
> a ? against each and every module in the d-i module lists.  We
> already have module-check watching for modules which dissappear and
> so there seem no advantage to not putting them in?  Thoughts?
> 

kernel-wedge does not handle the case where all modules are optional and
none of them were built. But, as you pointed out, we're already checking
for modules before udebs are packaged. +1 from me for making everything
optional.

rtg

-- 
Tim Gardner tim.gardner at canonical.com