Maverick Beta Approaching
tim.gardner at canonical.com
Tue Aug 24 13:36:46 UTC 2010
On 08/24/2010 07:28 AM, David Henningsson wrote:
> 2010-08-24 14:52, Tim Gardner skrev:
>> On 08/24/2010 03:25 AM, David Henningsson wrote:
>>> 2010-08-24 03:35, Leann Ogasawara skrev:
>>>> On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 17:21 -0700, Leann Ogasawara wrote:
>>>>> kernel patches which you want to see included in the Maverick Beta
>>>>> kernel need to be submitted to this mailing list and obtain the
>>>>> necessary Ack's *before* this Fri Aug 27.
>>> I'm still new, and still looking for a checklist of what/how to do with
>>> my patches, what to put here and there to satisfy both upstream and
>>> Ubuntu. So far I've been sending them upstream only.
>>> Mind adding the attached ones for Maverick Beta? Some of them might
>>> already be there. Or do you prefer git SHA's?
>> David - all of these patches look appropriate for stable updates. If you
>> Cc: stable at kernel.org
>> immediately after your Signed-off-by: in the upstream submission, then
>> they'll automatically propagate to the various stable updates once they
>> are accepted into Linus' tree. Otherwise you'll have to send an email to
>> stable at kernel.org with the SHA1 from Linus' tree requesting them for
>> inclusion in the next stable update.
> Thanks for the tip, I hope I'll remember it for next time. However,
> IIRC, this can take several weeks, right? What if I want them to reach
> Ubuntu before that, due to e g various Ubuntu Archive freezes?
If you can show that these patches are in a maintainer's tree (like
Takashi's ALSA tree) and destined for mainline inclusion, then Leann
might consider taking them as pre-stable patches. These particular
patches are pretty minor, but a more complex patch would require a bit
more consideration because even if we take it now, the patch that lands
upstream could be quite different thus increasing our maintenance burden.
Tim Gardner tim.gardner at canonical.com
More information about the kernel-team