Tested your Lucid sru-18+19 branch
stefan.bader at canonical.com
Mon Aug 23 14:16:11 UTC 2010
On 08/23/2010 04:02 PM, Brad Figg wrote:
> On 08/23/2010 01:14 AM, Stefan Bader wrote:
>> On 08/21/2010 04:03 PM, Brad Figg wrote:
>>> On 08/20/2010 01:38 PM, Tim Gardner wrote:
>>>> Looks good. The desktop responsiveness is far superior under load compared to what it was at release.
>>> Greg released .20 on Friday. In it were two mm patches. We already carry both
>>> of these patches so we are already up-to-date with respect to .20.
>> Right, I would propose a 18.104.22.168/20 update (the tracking bug) in this case.
>> For us the update between .19 and .20 is no change.
> The tracking bug is setup as a 18/19/20 tracking bug.
I think I noted somewhere before that I would at least split up 18 and 19. Those
releases are big enough to be better tracked in their own report.
More information about the kernel-team