[GIT PULL] mvl-dove branch sync'ed to Marvell Dove LSP 5.3.2
tim.gardner at canonical.com
Mon Aug 2 17:15:40 UTC 2010
On 08/02/2010 11:01 AM, Stefan Bader wrote:
> On 08/02/2010 05:50 PM, Eric Miao wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Tim Gardner<tim.gardner at canonical.com> wrote:
>>> On 08/02/2010 09:05 AM, Eric Miao wrote:
>>>> git://kernel.ubuntu.com/ycmiao/ubuntu-lucid.git mvl-dove
>> The original LSP 5.3.2 branch for reference is at:
>>> Did anyone notice that the patch 'Make some BT modules and ACL support for
>>> File System as defautl in dove_defconfig' doesn't actually do anything?
>> Grrr... the original change modified only dove_defconfig, and the change
>> was actually merged in a previous commit syncing the dove_defconfig,
>> leaving an almost empty commit after rebasing. We can safely remove
>>> Nor does 'dove: fix SPI flash model and size found on db board'
>> The original patch also does nothing except for changing the comment.
>> Not really sure for its specific purpose, but simply merged here so to
>> avoid possible merge conflict in the future.
>>> So, what exactly are we supposed to do with this enormous pile of patches?
>>> They certainly don't pass SRU qualifications.
>> Hrm.... then I guess we need to figure out those we do need or
>> are simply fixing patches, and leave out those irrelevant. Yet I'm
>> afraid we'll be more and more difficult to merge further LSP syncs
>> from Marvell?
> Would this mean I should hold back with pulling anything?
Not necessarily. I just wanted to confirm that we don't consider
mvl-dove to be subject to SRU policies. As far as I know there has not
been stable working HW, so I guess it makes sense that there would be
some BSP updates. As soon as mvl-dove is used for a real project, then
we'll have to change our opinion wrt SRU.
Tim Gardner tim.gardner at canonical.com
More information about the kernel-team