[PATCH] mac80211: fix deferred hardware scan requests

Chase Douglas chase.douglas at canonical.com
Fri Apr 16 23:38:07 UTC 2010

On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Stefan Bader
<stefan.bader at canonical.com> wrote:
> Despite of likely knowing the intention I need to play dumb: what is the
> intention of this? There is not much indication which release you target,
> neither much help about the impact of the bug or the regression potential of the
> fix. What is the use case to trigger it.
> As we basically are locked down with the release kernel, we are now doing all
> fixes in SRU mode which requires a bit more explanation on things (see Leann's
> recent submissions).
> If this only triggers a warning but still leaves things workable, this should
> hopefully get back via stable. As normal SRU updates are in general limited to
> more serious issues.

Ok. I saw Leann with the SRU and forgot we are in that mode now. So do
we prefer the SRU justification in the patch email like Leann
provided, or in the bug report. The wiki page indicates that it should
be done in the bug report, but maybe we do things different in the

I think the issue doesn't take down the system, so once apport is
disabled for the release this probably won't be a big deal. I think we
should probably just wait for it to come from -stable assuming it
isn't rejected.

-- Chase

More information about the kernel-team mailing list