[PATCH 1/1] PM: Make warning in suspend_test_finish() less likely to happen
apw at canonical.com
Fri Oct 30 14:23:28 UTC 2009
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw at sisk.pl>
Increase TEST_SUSPEND_SECONDS to 10 so the warning in
suspend_test_finish() doesn't annoy the users of slower systems so much.
Also, make the warning print the suspend-resume cycle time, so that we
know why the warning actually triggered.
Patch prepared during the hacking session at the Kernel Summit in Tokyo.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw at sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds at linux-foundation.org>
(cherry picked from commit 04bf7539c08d64184736cdc5e4ad617eda77eb0f)
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw at canonical.com>
kernel/power/suspend_test.c | 5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/power/suspend_test.c b/kernel/power/suspend_test.c
index 17d8bb1..25596e4 100644
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
* The time it takes is system-specific though, so when we test this
* during system bootup we allow a LOT of time.
-#define TEST_SUSPEND_SECONDS 5
+#define TEST_SUSPEND_SECONDS 10
static unsigned long suspend_test_start_time;
@@ -49,7 +49,8 @@ void suspend_test_finish(const char *label)
* has some performance issues. The stack dump of a WARN_ON
* is more likely to get the right attention than a printk...
- WARN(msec > (TEST_SUSPEND_SECONDS * 1000), "Component: %s\n", label);
+ WARN(msec > (TEST_SUSPEND_SECONDS * 1000),
+ "Component: %s, time: %u\n", label, msec);
More information about the kernel-team