[Fwd: Re: [PATCH] x86: Relegate CONFIG_PAT to EMBEDDED]

Tim Gardner tim.gardner at canonical.com
Tue Oct 13 01:18:50 UTC 2009

Tim Gardner wrote:
> Andy, Stefan - Why _is_ it that we don't have PAT enabled? Wasn't it
> originally a prerequisite for KMS back in Jaunty days?
> There are some comments on LKML pointing out that we _should_ have PAT
> enabled, e.g., "[RFC Patch] use MTRR for write combining if PAT is not
> available"
> rtg


Tim Gardner tim.gardner at canonical.com

More information about the kernel-team mailing list