[Patch 0/5] [Karmic] SRU: AppArmor fixes

[Stefan Bader]

John Johansen wrote:
> Stefan Bader wrote:
>> Tim Gardner wrote:
>>> John Johansen wrote:
>>>> The following changes since commit 18fec74a0b2d08ddfe424cf9376a4f09fff9d2ee:
>>>>   Leann Ogasawara (1):
>>>>         UBUNTU: [Config] Move position of CONFIG_LIRC_ENE0100 for ports configs
>>>>
>>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>>
>>>>   git://kernel.ubuntu.com/jj/apparmor-karmic.git master
>>>>
>>>> John Johansen (5):
>>>>       UBUNTU: SAUCE: AppArmor: Fix oops after profile removal
>>>>       UBUNTU: SAUCE: AppArmor: Fix Oops when in apparmor_bprm_set_creds
>>>>       UBUNTU: SAUCE: AppArmor: Fix cap audit_caching preemption disabling
>>>>       UBUNTU: SAUCE: AppArmor: Fix refcounting bug causing leak of creds
>>>>       UBUNTU: SAUCE: AppArmor: Fix oops there is no tracer and doing unsafe transition.
>>>>
>>>>  ubuntu/apparmor/capability.c |    1 +
>>>>  ubuntu/apparmor/domain.c     |    9 +++++++--
>>>>  ubuntu/apparmor/policy.c     |    2 +-
>>>>  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I believe what Stefan was referring to when he mentioned requiring a
>>> more thorough SRU explanation for these patches was the SRU
>>> justification in the LP bug. The SRU review team do not necessarily look
>>> at the commit message, so placing the SRU justification therein is
>>> superfluous.
>>>
>>> See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates for more details.
>>>
>>> rtg
>> Sort of my fault. I was not specific enough. I asked for it in the mail but
>> sort of was meaning the 0/x introduction part (so a quick reviewer here on
>> the list does not need to check the bug reports).
>> The commit message itself should not contain it. In this case it might just
>> be an addition to it in the mails sent. Any way I would sort it out before
>> applying and this is more for future reference.
>>
> eh, no my fault for being to dense to stick in the right mail, or come back and ask about it.  I can resend with things in the correct place if you want.
> 
> john

Nah, too much effort now.

Stefan