[Jaunty] Proposing some ext4 patches

[Stefan Bader]

Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 07:39:12PM +0200, Stefan Bader wrote:
>> After we had https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389555 I had a look at
>> Ted's 2.6.28-stable repo to figure out, whether there might be some
>> more dangers lurking. Since his 2.6.28.10 tag there are 21 patches
>> difference between our and his ext4 tree. Quite a few of them are in
>> a gray zone of being of little risk but do not seem to be critical
>> enough to qualify for SRU. This would leave 7 (or 8) which we
>> probably should consider...
>> And (question to the SRU team) if we do, could we use one tracking report?
> 
> I'm fine with using a single SRU bug (i.e.: bug #389555) for all of the
> ext4-related backports that are deemed appropriate, provided that there
> aren't already multiple user bug reports in Launchpad for different problems
> that will be fixed in this update, and that should have verification done
> separately.
> 

OK, I will dig whether we already got reports on other issues before placing 
all of them into one.

Stefan

-- 

When all other means of communication fail, try words!