Review of the rfkill drivers in ubuntu
Tim Gardner
tim.gardner at canonical.com
Tue Jun 9 21:31:29 UTC 2009
Stefan Bader wrote:
> As part of the effort to clean up the ubuntu directory I had a look at the
> rfkill patches there (as those were deemed needing to go into staging soon).
>
> However I am not sure we really want this (how bad can a driver be before one
> gets clubbed with it?).
>
> * fsam7400 is based on pbe5 which is based on the av5100.
> * all three most be loaded manually and will take the state of the radio
> from the argument (not from the current hw state)
> * Only fsam7400 makes some effort to check the bios signature. The other
> two just punch on the ports.
> * The control interface is procfs. No use of any rfkill framework.
> * fsam7400 and pbe5 state the port information has been extracted by
> disassembling windows drvers (maybe the smallest issue)
>
> I got the feeling that in the current state the drivers are not ready for
> staging and to make them better we would need to find someone with that HW.
> Maybe we should disable them and see who shouts? Thoughts?
>
>
Perhaps we should send email to the developers of the various drivers in
order to gauge their interest. If we don't get a positive response,
_then_ we can disable the driver.
rtg
--
Tim Gardner tim.gardner at canonical.com
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list