[PATCH 1/1] V4L/DVB (9848): gspca: Webcam 06f8:3004 added in sonixj.

Amit Kucheria amit.kucheria at canonical.com
Thu Jun 4 05:46:30 UTC 2009


On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 11:10:46PM +0800, Bryan Wu wrote:
> From: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf at free.fr>
> 
> Bug: #374122
> BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+source/linux/+bug/374122
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf at free.fr>
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab at redhat.com>
> (cherry picked from commit 3319dc98a742d445a660268a6ce3426ad0922e2a)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu at canonical.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/video4linux/gspca.txt |    1 +
>  drivers/media/video/gspca/sonixj.c  |    1 +
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/video4linux/gspca.txt b/Documentation/video4linux/gspca.txt
> index 9cf57d8..a8370aa 100644
> --- a/Documentation/video4linux/gspca.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/video4linux/gspca.txt
> @@ -170,6 +170,7 @@ spca500		06bd:0404	Agfa CL20
>  spca500		06be:0800	Optimedia
>  sunplus		06d6:0031	Trust 610 LCD PowerC at m Zoom
>  spca506		06e1:a190	ADS Instant VCD
> +sonixj		06f8:3004	Hercules Classic Silver
>  spca508		0733:0110	ViewQuest VQ110
>  spca508		0130:0130	Clone Digital Webcam 11043
>  spca501		0733:0401	Intel Create and Share
> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/gspca/sonixj.c b/drivers/media/video/gspca/sonixj.c
> index 53cb82d..b186609 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/video/gspca/sonixj.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/video/gspca/sonixj.c
> @@ -1626,6 +1626,7 @@ static const __devinitdata struct usb_device_id device_table[] = {
>  	{USB_DEVICE(0x0471, 0x0328), BSI(SN9C105, MI0360, 0x5d)},
>  #endif
>  	{USB_DEVICE(0x0471, 0x0330), BSI(SN9C105, MI0360, 0x5d)},
> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x06f8, 0x3004), BSI(SN9C105, OV7660, 0x21)},
>  	{USB_DEVICE(0x0c45, 0x6040), BSI(SN9C102P, HV7131R, 0x11)},
>  /* bw600.inf:
>  	{USB_DEVICE(0x0c45, 0x6040), BSI(SN9C102P, MI0360, 0x5d)}, */
> -- 
> 1.6.0.4
>

I thought this was exactly the kind of device enablement patches that we
would _NOT_ add to a releassed distro anymore?

Or did I interpret it incorrectly?

/Amit

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Amit Kucheria, Kernel Engineer || amit.kucheria at canonical.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------




More information about the kernel-team mailing list