Kerneloops

[Amit Kucheria]

On 09 Jul 06, James Westby wrote:
> Amit Kucheria wrote:
> > As Manoj already pointed out, tagging the LP bug as reported upstream
> > (via kerneloops) would be helpful. Is it possible to file the same bug
> > automatically in bugzilla.kernel.org and LP and link them?
> 
> If the kernel bugzilla enables the LP plugin then my understanding is
> that you can push bugs easily to it from LP. I'm reluctant to send
> bugs there automatically though. I thought one point of kerneloops.org
> was to avoid having bugs for all of these issues in  bugzilla?

Not sure what the status of their bugzilla installing the LP plugin is.
Leanne should know more. She was talking to Linux kernel QA over at
Google.

> > Atleast for the kernel, the duplicate finder is relatively useless
> > because bugs are so HW-dependent. I am fairly certain that we prefer
> > people to file separate bugs that _we_ mark as duplicate.
> 
> That's good to know thanks. I'll not spend time on dupe-detection across
> users then.
> 
> It sounds like you are happy for kerneloops reports to be filed as LP
> bugs as well by default? If so then I will proceed with the
> implementation.

Yes, the idea of apport integration in kerneloops was that we (Ubuntu)
would be cc'ed on all those bugs. 

Regards,
Amit

--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Amit Kucheria, Kernel Engineer || amit.kucheria at canonical.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------