Kerneloops

[Amit Kucheria]

On 09 Jun 29, James Westby wrote:
> [Please Cc me on replies as I am no subscribed]
> 
> I've been asked to get kerneloops installed by default this cycle, and
> I have some ideas about how to integrate it better with apport, however
> I would like to know what you would like to get from it.
> 
> I have drafted a spec at
> 
>   https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KerneloopsAndApport
> 
> with how I think they should co-operate, but there is an outstanding
> question of what you would like reported.
> 
> I assume we would like all reports going to kerneloops.org by default?
> Do you also want the reports to be sent to Launchpad for tracking as
> bugs?

As Manoj already pointed out, tagging the LP bug as reported upstream
(via kerneloops) would be helpful. Is it possible to file the same bug
automatically in bugzilla.kernel.org and LP and link them?

> We can look at having them duplicated when they refer to the same
> Oops so that you don't have to do that manually, but I want to
> know if having them as bug reports would be useful anyway.

Atleast for the kernel, the duplicate finder is relatively useless
because bugs are so HW-dependent. I am fairly certain that we prefer
people to file separate bugs that _we_ mark as duplicate.

/Amit

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Amit Kucheria, Kernel Engineer || amit.kucheria at canonical.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------