cooloney at kernel.org
Mon Jan 5 02:32:27 GMT 2009
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Andy Whitcroft <apw at canonical.com> wrote:
> In this bug, someone has pointed out that the Intel firmware requires an
> EULA that we are not presenting:
Is that a real bug? I guess it relates to the license issue.
> I am sure this is under control as we are so closly in touch with Intel.
> Does anyone have any background on this?
Can we set this driver as a restricted module?
More information about the kernel-team