[PATCH 0/1] [HARDY SRU] LP#406419 -- usb device detection regression

Stefan Bader stefan.bader at canonical.com
Thu Aug 20 18:00:05 UTC 2009


Mario Limonciello wrote:
> Considering this regression was caused by a -updates kernel, is there
> a provision of the policy for how long the fix takes to enter updates
> rather than waiting for the next hardy point release?
> 
> On 08/19/2009, Stefan Bader <stefan.bader at canonical.com> wrote:
>> Andy Whitcroft wrote:
>>> Following a resent -updates kernel we are not correctly detecting newly
>>> inserted USB devices, requiring a manual rescan to detect them.  This is
>>> related to the changes under the commit below:
>>>
>>>     UBUNTU: USB: EHCI: add separate IAA watchdog timer
>>>
>>> The following upstream patch has been tested to fix this regression.
>>>
>>> Proposing for SRU to hardy.  Pull request below.
>>>
>>> -apw
>>>
>>>
>>> The following changes since commit
>>> 117303a5155683091c24f149ae624bbffcc52667:
>>>   Stefan Bader (1):
>>>         UBUNTU: Merge 2.6.24-24.57 security release Ignore: yes
>>>
>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>
>>>   git://kernel.ubuntu.com/apw/ubuntu-hardy.git lp406419
>>>
>>> Alan Stern (1):
>>>       USB: EHCI: fix remote-wakeup regression
>>>
>>>  drivers/usb/host/ehci-hub.c |    6 ++++--
>>>  drivers/usb/host/ehci.h     |    2 ++
>>>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>> Applied, thanks
>>
>> --
>>
>> When all other means of communication fail, try words!
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> kernel-team mailing list
>> kernel-team at lists.ubuntu.com
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-team
>>
> 
The patch has been uploaded in a Hardy kernel to proposed today. After 
accepting this into proposed, it depends also on bug-reporters/testers how long 
it takes to get moved to updates.

-Stefan

-- 

When all other means of communication fail, try words!






More information about the kernel-team mailing list