[ubuntu/jaunty] linux 2.6.28-11.39 (Accepted)
Tim Gardner
tim.gardner at canonical.com
Thu Apr 2 13:31:02 UTC 2009
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 02:22:40AM -0000, Tim Gardner wrote:
>> [ Alan Tull ]
>>
>> * SAUCE: mx51: fix to1.1 in mxc_iomux_set_input
>> - LP: #348333
>> [...]
>> * SAUCE: imx51: fec: fix cache operations for receive
>> - LP: #348333
>
> These two changelog items reference the same bug number. Was this
> intentional?
>
Quite often a bug fix requires more then one commit, each of which has
the bug number referenced in the commit log. The kernel changelog is
automatically generated using the bug numbers from the commit log, hence
the reason that there are multiple references to the same bug number.
I've had indications from folks that they prefer it this way (e.g. each
changelog entry has a bug reference) as opposed to multiple
commit/changelog entries with only one bug number.
rtg
--
Tim Gardner tim.gardner at canonical.com
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list