SRU request for LP#241229

Wang, Yong Y yong.y.wang at intel.com
Thu Jun 19 12:52:13 UTC 2008


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefan Bader [mailto:stefan.bader at canonical.com] 
> Sent: 2008年6月19日 19:35
> To: Wang, Yong Y
> Cc: kernel-team at lists.ubuntu.com
> Subject: Re: SRU request for LP#241229
> 
> Wang, Yong Y wrote:
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/241229
> > 
> > SRU justification:
> > 
> > The ACPI BIOSes of some problematic machines, e.g. Toshiba Satellite
> > L35, only export C1 when running on AC while the same 
> machines support
> > more than C1 when running on battery. This results in
> > cpuidle_register_device not being called during system 
> initialization
> > when running on battery. However, cpuidle_enable_device 
> will be called
> > without cpuidle_register_device being called before when 
> user switches
> > from AC to DC and _CST changed notification occurs, thus the oops. 
> > 
> > Upstream bug report can be found at
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10394 and Cherry picking
> > upstream dcb84f335bee9c9a7781cfc5d74492dccaf066d2 can fix it.
> > 
> > Fix is available below:
> > 
> > The following changes since commit
> > 70cb93e6771963cca14ad9a3d87687484ee02428:
> >   Stefan Bader (1):
> >         UBUNTU: ACPICA: Fix for resource descriptor 
> optimization issues
> > for _CRS/_SRC
> > 
> > are available in the git repository at:
> > 
> >   git://kernel.ubuntu.com/ywang/ubuntu-hardy.git master
> > 
> > Yong Wang (1):
> >       UBUNTU: cpuidle acpi driver: fix oops on AC<->DC
> > 
> >  drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c |   26 +++++++++++++++++++-------
> >  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c     |   40
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >  include/linux/cpuidle.h       |    3 ++-
> >  3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > 
> > -Yong
> > 
> Hi Yong,
> 
> looking at your backported patch I noticed that it also introduces an
> override option for cpuidle. Was this strictly necessary or rather
> because upstream just has this in place and the patch didn't apply
> otherwise?
> 

Stefan, thanks for reviewing the patch. I did not introduce any new override option in the patch. The idle=[poll, mwait] option has been there for quite a while. However, I did backported another upstream patch 36a913586597cab1cd565e9bf348d037f0df955b along this one which really fix the AC<->DC oops bug. Otherwise, I cannot make this patch as clean as I expect;-)

-Yong




More information about the kernel-team mailing list