[Bug 598664] Re: resume fails in development kernels
Andy Whitcroft
apw at canonical.com
Mon Aug 16 15:39:06 UTC 2010
@nnutter -- the testing you have reported seems to be with (what is now)
pretty early Maverick kernels. I wonder if you would be able to test
with the very latest version (based on the released v2.6.35 + stable
updates) and confirm if that is affected; we have reports of known
suspend/resume issues being resolved for other Lenovo models with the
most recent upstream updates. You also mention that you had no issues
running Lucid on this machine, It might be helpful to have the dmesg
output from the machine following a boot/suspend/resume on a Lucid
kernel (please label this dmesg very clearly when attaching), you should
be able to install a Lucid kernel into your Maverick userspace and boot
it for that. For the v2.6.34/35 testing you report above, which kernel
builds were these, was the v2.6.35 the official release version. Also
where did you get the builds were they the ones from the Mainline Builds
archive? Could we also get a dmesg from the working kernel you have,
again label this dmesg very clearly.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/MainlineBuilds
I have spent some time looking at your working configuration but it is
so divorced from the Ubuntu config as to be almost impossible to use as
a comparison source, nothing obvious jumps out from a visual inspection.
The diffstat between your working one and our current kernel
configuration shows it to be something like 90% different:
i386-config.flavour.generic | 5606 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 4283 insertions(+), 1323 deletions(-)
Looking at the output of your debugging run, the Hash is pointing to the
PNP Timer, it might be worth testing the broken kernels with each of
'nohpet' and 'nolapic' (individually) to see if they have any effect.
If you could perform any of the testing above and report back here that
would be helpful. Thanks.
--
resume fails in development kernels
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/598664
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Bugs, which is subscribed to linux in ubuntu.
More information about the kernel-bugs
mailing list