[Bug 317227] Re: skb_over_panic skbuff.c:128 invalid opcode: 0000 [1] SMP

Stefan Richter stefan-r-ubz at s5r6.in-berlin.de
Mon Apr 13 00:04:04 UTC 2009


> I read in another bug though that ubuntu devs don't want bugs filed
> upstream and instead want them filed with LP:
...
> This inconsistency makes it difficult to know when to file upstream and
> when not to.

I'm not speaking for Canonical, I'm not even using Ubuntu.  I'm only
watching this bug because I am one of the upstream kernel driver
developers (ieee1394; Carl's report was loosely related to 1394).

If there is a possibility that a bug is an upstream bug --- and if your
distributor has no manpower to look at bugs and to get in touch with
upstream themselves --- then file a report with upstream.  Best would be
of course if one of you could test an unmodified kernel.org kernel for
your report; ideally the latest release*.  (Note, reports about kernels
with proprietary drivers inserted into them do not have much value for
bugzilla.kernel.org because such kernels cannot really be debugged.)

*) Does Ubuntu have packages of vanilla kernels?

-- 
skb_over_panic skbuff.c:128 invalid opcode: 0000 [1] SMP 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317227
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Bugs, which is subscribed to Linux.




More information about the kernel-bugs mailing list