[Bug 59695] Re: High frequency of load/unload cycles on some hard disks may shorten lifetime

[DGMcCloud]

In my opinion, the problem is not in those scripts, nor is it a Dell
problem. The problem is the crappy power management in laptop HDDs. I
own a Dell D820 with a Hitachi HDD by the way.

I recently had contact with Hitachi technical support on this issue.
They advised me to put my HDD APM to setting "Active Idle" (setting 192)
using their own Hitachi tool. The Dell bios on my system doesn't even
touch the drives APM settings, it is controlled by the HDD firmware
settings itself (and can be changed). Setting APM to 192 using the
Hitachi Tool is basically the same as executing the 'hdparm -B 192
/de/sda' in Ubuntu, the only difference is that this is now the drives
default (which used to be 128).

In my opinion (I have no scientific data to back this up, its just
something I observed), the APM, and especially the disk head parking
time (the clicking noise is the disk head parking) is set to a Windows
timing. What I mean with this is that most of the time (unless you're
doing nothing for a long time) Windows is accessing the disk every 4 or
5 seconds, which is too fast for the disk heads to park. However, Linux
is much more disk efficient, accessing the disk at a slightly higher
interval (say 8 seconds). What happens is that the Linux disk access
timing has an idle time which is high enough for the heads to park, and
just after they've parked, the disk is accessed again. In my opinion,
this is what is causing the LoadCycleCount to increase so rapidly on
Ubuntu (and other Linux distro's for that matter).

What would be a good solution is to have a disk head parking time (the
idle time needed for the disk heads to park) which is configurable.
However, at least on my Hitachi drive, this can't be done. Setting APM
to 191 uses the same timing as 128, and 192 switches head parking off
completely. There is absolutely no way to control the timing. Another
option would be to configure Linux in such a way that it accesses the
disk at a much higher rate OR a much lower rate. Either option would be
sufficient to solve the problem. The only difference is that with a
higher disk access rate, the heads will not park that often (but will
park when you're doing nothing at all).

-- 
High frequency of load/unload cycles on some hard disks may shorten lifetime
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59695
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Bugs, which is subscribed to linux-meta in ubuntu.