[Bug 86778] Re: Precedence bug in patch
Blaisorblade
p.giarrusso at gmail.com
Thu Aug 28 23:53:09 UTC 2008
I marked the issue as "confirmed" myself because I am confident of what
I said, and that the trivial change I suggested fixes the problem. And
any competent C programmer can agree on that, after reading my report.
I avoided whining for long time, but the only conclusion I can give to
this is that you have no competent C programmer, in your bug tracking
team. Actually, not enough to even read bug reports.
Given that I have sent two kernel bug reports containing the solution,
that I'm a kernel hacker myself, and that after more than one year the
bug is still open, how will you be able to handle _real_ bug reports,
where finding the problem is damn difficult?
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.15 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
Precedence bug in patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/86778
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Bugs, which is subscribed to linux-source-2.6.15 in ubuntu.
More information about the kernel-bugs
mailing list