[Bug 43531] Re: Kernel isn't very useful without a boot loader, but doesn't depend on one

Colin Watson cjwatson at canonical.com
Tue Jul 11 09:19:33 UTC 2006


Note that there is already a nobootloader installer component, so there
is no need for complicated schemes involving asking the user strange
questions, since the framework's already there in the installer in the
event that neither grub nor lilo nor yaboot (etc.) is appropriate.
nobootloader.postinst should apt-install this new no-boot-loader
package. (A name that's less confusing given the existence of
nobootloader would be nice, though!)

-- 
Kernel isn't very useful without a boot loader, but doesn't depend on one
https://launchpad.net/bugs/43531




More information about the kernel-bugs mailing list