[Bug 8551] IBM Stack Smashing Protector (a.k.a ProPolice) kernel-level helpers

[bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.ubuntu.com]

Please do not reply to this email.  You can add comments at
http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=8551
Ubuntu | linux





------- Additional Comments From lorenzo at debian-hardened.org  2005-04-13 18:28 UTC -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Why isn't this patch upstream? has it ever been proposed for inclusion?
> If so please provide a reference to the thread on LKML.

No, and it won't be proposed.
It will be send to IBM people working on SSP though, just for mention, but
anyways, It's distro-specific stuff and I wrote it with Ubuntu in mind (even if
it will be very helpful after I get time to work out some things around it).

> While the patch looks clean, it can easily clash with further kernel development
> since the syscalls are numbered in sequence, that would require extra maintainance
> for us.

Right, I will take care of that and even try to propose (I said the opposite a
few lines above, but nothing to loss if I propose it, it's just that they will
reply with the usual statement).
Also, it won't be really a problem, 2.6 will get more "stable" (in development
terms) in a near future ;D

> Also the fact that patch is not portable makes it use very limited and specific.
> 
> What are the plans for porting it?

Right, I have plans for porting it ASAP and as soon as I get (access to) a
sparc{,64} machine or any other one to start testing.
I have very limited infrastructure here, so, by now I just own i386 (or I just
only have access to i386).

Cheers and many thanks for your fast reply :)

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.