PROPOSAL: stop recording 'executing update-status hook'

roger peppe roger.peppe at canonical.com
Fri May 19 07:21:49 UTC 2017


On 19 May 2017 at 03:13, Tim Penhey <tim.penhey at canonical.com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Currently juju will update the status of any hook execution for any unit to
> show that it is busy doing things. This was all well and good until we do
> things based on time.
>
> Every five minutes (or so) each unit will have the update-status hook
> executed to allow the unit to set or update the workload status based on
> what is currently going on with that unit.
>
> Since all hook executions are stored, this means that the show-status-log
> will show the unit jumping from executing update-status to ready and back
> every five minutes.
>
> The proposal is to special case the update-status hook and show in status
> (or the status-log) that the hook is being executed. debug-log will continue
> to show the hook executing if you are looking.

Presumably you mean *not* show in status here?



More information about the Juju mailing list