Charm Store Policy Update: Propritary applications usage of Terms and Resources

[Charles Butler]

I'm +1 to requiring terms and resources for prop. applications.

This will effectively funnel our new onboarding efforts of these vendors
into the juju 2.0 path, and start them off using best practices - which
will really lend a hand to the robustness of their deployment (see: behind
the corp firewall)  As I just went through several rounds of this with our
own firewall setup to onboard a vendor into OIL.  Additionally it removes a
barrier to entry as many of these apps are behind registration walls or pay
walls (needs citation). Anywhere that we can ease use for our consumers I
am a loud +1.

Further more, terms ensures their IP concerns are being handled
appropriately. You don't agree to pay? you don't get to play.




On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 9:28 AM Mark Shuttleworth <mark at ubuntu.com> wrote:

> On 26/05/16 00:21, Tom Barber wrote:
> >
> > I think Terms are good but terms for open source is overkill.
> >
> > For example if I apt install openjdk I wouldn't accept any terms
> > during the install process, but if I apt install oracle-jdk I would.
> >
> >
>
> Agreed, no acknowledgement of terms should be needed for FLOSS charms or
> resources.
>
> Mark
>
> --
> Juju mailing list
> Juju at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
>
-- 
Juju Charmer
Canonical Group Ltd.
Ubuntu - Linux for human beings | www.ubuntu.com
Juju - The fastest way to model your service | www.jujucharms.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju/attachments/20160526/ad133b7f/attachment.html>