New feature for charmers - min-juju-version

[Mark Shuttleworth]

On 17/03/16 22:34, Nate Finch wrote:
> Yes, it'll be ignored, and the charm will be deployed normally.
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 3:29 PM Ryan Beisner <ryan.beisner at canonical.com>
> wrote:
>
>> This is awesome.  What will happen if a charm possesses the flag in
>> metadata.yaml and is deployed with 1.25.x?  Will it gracefully ignore it?
>>

I wonder if there is a clean way for us to have Juju 1.x reject the
charm very early in the process, giving an error that would essentially
amount to the "not understood"? Or if we could have the charm store
refuse to serve up the charm to a 1.x Juju client / server?

Mark