Juju 2.0 not compatible with lxd 2.1, watch upgrading

Stéphane Graber stephane.graber at canonical.com
Thu Aug 18 17:03:49 UTC 2016


On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 04:52:48PM +0000, Rick Harding wrote:
> It was caught today in Juju testing that we fail to build with the latest
> lxd 2.1 [1]. This initially seems like it's an issue in that the team
> checks for lxd versioning much too tightly. We're working to update this as
> fast as possible and doing some testing to see what's new in 2.1 that might
> cause any issues.
> 
> In the mean time, please be aware when upgrading that if you upgrade lxd to
> 2.1 you will not be able to use lxd with it until we get our updates in
> place.
> 
> Rick
> 
> 1: https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1614559

Hi Rick,

Hmm, so it looks like Juju itself is parsing the LXD version and failing?

That's a bit weird as I'd have expected it to instead check for the API
version (1.0) if even checking anything.


I've been using the Juju betas with the git version of LXD on my
machines without any problem, up until the time where I actually tagged
LXD 2.1. So I don't think there is any actual problem with the new LXD
and Juju, other than what looks like a buggy version check :)



Oh, also, LXD only ever shows you the public part of the certificate, it
doesn't expose the private key, so it's perfectly fine to include the
log in bug reports.

-- 
Stéphane Graber
Ubuntu developer
http://www.canonical.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju/attachments/20160818/27812256/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Juju mailing list