openstack hard depency or not

John Arbash Meinel john at arbash-meinel.com
Sat Nov 16 11:47:40 UTC 2013


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2013-11-16 15:20, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote:
> Hi all. I like to provide for users ability to install popular 
> software and try to choise what the best - aps or juju charms? Does
> juju needs openstack or i can provide some api to juju and it run 
> smoothly not only on openstack? P.S. Now i need run all stuff only
> on single instance.
> 

Openstack isn't a strict dependency, though Juju is designed primarily
to work on *a* cloud. (MaaS, Openstack, Ec2, etc).

We are working on doing manual provisioning. Where you just register
machines with Juju rather than provision them from a cloud. Basic
support is available, but my understanding is that it still needs a
little bit of polish before the experience is smooth.

One option is to use the "local" provider, which runs everything on
LXC instances. However, we don't expose those services onto your eth0
network. I think there was a patch around that would let the LXC
instances run on a bridged network, which would let you expose those
services.

You'd need to set up your own br0 for your LXC containers to use, and
then you can set "network-bridge: br0" in your environments.yaml for
the 'local' provider.

There is a little bit more information available here:
https://juju.ubuntu.com/docs/config-local.html

John
=:->

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlKHW1sACgkQJdeBCYSNAAOZIQCeNcEvo2fIkvD++mAixXSwST/k
U6YAn2kPvQnKpw75XEKvoblPuPM8jAEd
=tMr2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Juju mailing list