Policy proposal: All new charms must include tests.

[Vincent JOBARD]

@Mark

2013/12/13 Mark Shuttleworth <mark at ubuntu.com>

> Those are all good points. Our rating system is really good - it maps to
> rigorous assessment of "what matters". My guess is people will strongly
> prefer charms that have 3-star or more ratings. So that was why I was
> suggesting that we make a few "trump" categories, in other words, even
> if you score highly on all the other criteria, absence of comprehensive
> tests limits you to 2-stars. That's a nice incentive for people with a
> basically-working charm to invest in tests.
>

In this case I'm totally agree with you. And we have to write it clear into
the documentation, with maybe a redundance between the how to push charm
into store, the rating system,  and how to write test for charms. Else,
they will be some Canonical bashing arguing that Canonical is cheating
about rating

Best Regards,

Winael
http://aliaz.com/winael
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju/attachments/20131213/c1b288d3/attachment.html>