juju publish is coming

[Gustavo Niemeyer]

Very true, but please note that this won't come in that initial work.
For that to work, juju publish will have to handle initialization of
repositories, fetching and updating off-band content, etc. I still
think these are a good idea, but it's a further step on top of these
few improvements that were mentioned in the initial message. At the
moment publishing charms is well sub-standard even for people that
know how to use bzr very well. Fixing just that is already a
significant benefit for the workflow.


On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Robbie Williamson
<robbie.williamson at canonical.com> wrote:
> On 04/01/2013 03:58 PM, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
>> It's doing everything that the example
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Tim Penhey <tim.penhey at canonical.com> wrote:
>>> I did read the examples, but it was not obvious.
>>>
>>> Is it only wrapping 'bzr push', or is it doing other things too?
>>
>> It's talking to the store as well to improve the user experience as
>> indicated in the examples.
>>
>> Have you published a charm before?
>>
>>
> One of the main benefits of getting 'juju publish' is to remove the
> requirement of knowing how/having to use bzr for charm publishing.
>
>
> --
> Robbie Williamson <robbie.williamson at canonical.com>
> Vice President, Cloud Development and Operations
> Canonical Ltd.
>
> "You can't be lucky all the time, but you can be smart everyday"
>  -16 Blocks by Richard Wenk



-- 

gustavo @ http://niemeyer.net