Does juju support 'named' interfaces?

[Gustavo Niemeyer]

On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Sidnei da Silva
<sidnei.da.silva at canonical.com> wrote:
> One thing that's not clear is if the service name is exposed in a way
> that it can be used like that.

The service *name* shouldn't be used in the charm implementation. The
user should be free to name his service whatever he pleases and the
service itself should continue to work.  Relations exist to define
that kind of.. well, relationship.


gustavo @ http://niemeyer.net