Charm branch names

[Kapil Thangavelu]

Excerpts from Gustavo Niemeyer's message of Wed Jan 18 11:59:47 -0500 2012:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 14:04, Kapil Thangavelu
> <kapil.thangavelu at canonical.com> wrote:
> > Some of the trunk-1 branches are effective trunk branches, the naming reflects a
> 
> Is there a reason for them to not be named as "trunk"?
> 

none that i know of, afaik its just a histerical raison from an lp migration ;-)