Charm Testing Spec Proposal
gustavo.niemeyer at canonical.com
Wed Feb 1 20:47:27 UTC 2012
> I wouldn't mind at all, it just hasn't happened yet. I don't have lbox,
> haven't taken time to set it up, and don't know of anybody else in
> ~charmers using it for work done on charm-tools or charms.
So how about starting now?
> I'm sure its just a few lines of setup, but its another point of re-focus
> in an already blurry space. Can we perhaps delay introduction of this
> tool and workflow change until such time as we can give it the attention
> it needs?
Yes, it's a *trivial* setup, and will help people to take the time to
review your proposal. I don't think I'm being unfair.. you're asking
me to review your whole spec, and I'm asking you to type "lbox
propose" within your branch.
-- I'm not absolutely sure of anything.
More information about the Juju