r398 uploaded and awaiting ubuntu-release team approval
kirkland at canonical.com
Mon Oct 10 16:27:31 UTC 2011
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Kapil Thangavelu
<kapil.thangavelu at canonical.com> wrote:
> Sounds good, the release dance must end, so the next can begin.
> I've marked the sru bugs (merged since 398 and still pending) against the
> distribution of juju and the oneiric updates milestone.
>> To pass the normal SRU process, each issue needs a clear test case which
>> can be performed by a 3rd party (not the SRU team, and not the developers
>> coding the fix).
> Sounds good. Is the proper place for this reproducing test case the bug report?
The 'best practice' here is to put that toward the end of the bug's
description itself, clearly noted between <hr>-style lines of
========== (which can be edited later, unlike comments).
Manager, Systems Integration
More information about the Juju