Charm Testing == Complex Deployment Testing Automation

Mark Shuttleworth mark at
Tue Oct 4 10:26:54 UTC 2011

On 10/04/2011 09:36 AM, James Page wrote:
> Hi Mark
> On 04/10/11 08:12, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> > This is great work, James. One question though is whether it will
> > easily support co-located charms (multiple charms in action on a
> > single node). I think the paths invoked may need to be
> > charm-specific in order to handle those cases, and while co-located
> > charms aren't a current feature, it's worth thinking ahead in that
> > regard.
> I think that should be easy to support; The charm being tested could
> actually provide a bit more information to the charm-tester about
> where its test script is and where its going to store results which
> would remove the requirement to have anything in /opt/formula-tester.

Explicit beats implicit every time, so +1 from me :-)


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <>

More information about the Juju mailing list