juju for testing purposes

Robert Collins robert.collins at canonical.com
Thu Nov 24 17:25:12 UTC 2011

On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Marc Tardif <marc.tardif at canonical.com> wrote:
> Considering the asynchronous nature of juju, a message queue interface to
> which I could subscribe seems to ring more true than a restful interface
> that I would need to poll periodically. Not being particularly familiar
> with the project, yet, would that make sense?

I think that fits quite well. OTOH for your specific case you could
POST straight back to the results-tracker/yourprojectname, assuming
your test suite supports subunit.


More information about the Juju mailing list