Charm maintainership in metadata.yaml?
robbie at ubuntu.com
Mon Nov 14 22:35:13 UTC 2011
On 11/14/2011 04:19 PM, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> On 14/11/11 22:17, Clint Byrum wrote:
>> Likewise, there will be charms with no maintainer that will
>> be handled much like Ubuntu packages, where the maintainer would just
>> be charmers at ubuntu.com or something like that.
> I think it would be good practice to have a designated person or LP team
> associated with every charm; an overall core charmers team would have a
> mandate to amend any core charm, but the charms should all have
> designated maintainers rather than being in one single bucket.
+1. In recent efforts to have better/faster initial response to bugs in
Ubuntu packages residing in Main, we thought to use the package
maintainer to determine which team should be first responder...until we
noticed the *heavy* use of the generic "Ubuntu Developers" maintainer,
with email pointing to ubuntu-devel-discuss :/.
Robbie Williamson <robbie at ubuntu.com>
"You can't be lucky all the time, but you can be smart everyday"
"Arrogance is thinking you are better than everyone else, while
Confidence is knowing no one else is better than you." -Me ;)
More information about the Juju