Charm maintainership in metadata.yaml?

Mark Shuttleworth mark at
Mon Nov 14 22:19:48 UTC 2011

On 14/11/11 22:17, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Likewise, there will be charms with no maintainer that will
> be handled much like Ubuntu packages, where the maintainer would just
> be charmers at or something like that.

I think it would be good practice to have a designated person or LP team
associated with every charm; an overall core charmers team would have a
mandate to amend any core charm, but the charms should all have
designated maintainers rather than being in one single bucket.


More information about the Juju mailing list