machine placement spec
roger.peppe at canonical.com
Fri Nov 11 13:39:47 UTC 2011
On 11 November 2011 13:13, Gustavo Niemeyer
<gustavo.niemeyer at canonical.com> wrote:
>> small devil's advocate moment:
>> ".4e6K", "NaNG" ?
>> it might be worth restricting the float syntax.
> William really meant "number with a dot" rather than IEEE floating point.
that's what i thought, which is why i made the suggestion.
"number with a dot" LGTM, even though unfortunately
we don't always end up with a whole number of bytes
(assuming 1G is 1GiB not 1GB).
i don't think that will matter too much in practice unless the
constraints start being used as specifications at some
point in the future.
More information about the Juju