Preventing IE10 regressions

[Benji York]

On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Kapil Thangavelu
<kapil.thangavelu at canonical.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Benji York <benji.york at canonical.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Gary Poster <gary.poster at canonical.com>
>> wrote:
[...]
> > Do you plan for Jenkins to trigger tests on trunk landing, or daily, do
>> > you
>> > think?  If it's just as easy, I would prefer trunk landing.
>>
>> According to Diogo Matsubara setting up tarmac to be a gatekeeper is
>> easy, so that is another option as well.  Does anyone object to using
>> tarmac to run these tests and ensure they pass before a branch can land?
>> It would probably mean not using lbox submit any more (but we can still
>> use lbox propose as before).
>>
>
> two thought on tarmac integration, its significantly more process on merging
> then we have now (setup commit messages on mp, mark mps approved, wait for
> tarmac and success or on failure rinse lather repeat).  i'd rather we could
> just submit build jobs to jenkins via its api perhaps as part of lbox check
> depending on the speed of the test running there. second thought, tarmac
> adds alot of noise to the commit log which lbox helps keep clean.

In light of the objections to tarmac I will proceed assuming we will be
using Jenkins to do post-land testing of trunk.
-- 
Benji York