Should 'juju status' always include a timestamp

[Jason Hobbs]

Yes, a timestamp is always appropriate.

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:12 AM, Merlijn Sebrechts
<merlijn.sebrechts at gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Op wo 18 apr. 2018 om 09:19 schreef John A Meinel
> <john.meinel at canonical.com>:
>>
>> I was just going over a list of pastes from James Beedy on this bug:
>>   https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1763963
>>
>> And I realized that something that would be really nice is to just have
>> some sort of timestamp so you could see how much time elapsed between each
>> "juju status". And given the use of 'juju status' it seems like something
>> that would generally be useful. (sharing a snapshot with someone else would
>> always be done with the context of *when* you ran that status, so you could
>> correlate it with other information like load metrics, etc.)
>>
>> Thoughts? It seems easy enough to add, but do people feel that it
>> does/doesn't belong?
>>
>> John
>> =:->
>>
>> --
>> Juju-dev mailing list
>> Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
>
>
> --
> Juju-dev mailing list
> Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev
>