Juju 2.3 beta2 is here!

[Mark Shuttleworth]

On 11/07/2017 03:11 PM, John Meinel wrote:
> ...
>  
>
>     > Perhaps just:
>     >
>     >   juju deploy --map-machines A=B,C=D
>     >
>     > ... or some variant of that?
>     >
>     > Let's use the betas to refine and condense and clarify.
>
>     +1 to that. I'm wondering if use-existing-machines is ever appropriate
>     on its own, as the machine numbers in a model are ephemeral but
>     machine numbers in a bundle are static.
>
>
> Feedback from Admins that one of their big use case really is for
> bundle-a to lay down a definition/base charm across everything, and
> bundle-b to be meant as an exact overlay, and all of the machine-ids
> are exact matches. And having to specify 0=0,...50=50 is a lot of ugly
> boilerplate.

I would expect that --map-machines means that machine numbers correspond
UNLESS remapped. So your ugly boilerplate is not needed.

Mark
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju-dev/attachments/20171109/16bee483/attachment.html>