PROPOSAL: stop recording 'executing update-status hook'

Uros Jovanovic uros.jovanovic at canonical.com
Fri May 19 08:23:15 UTC 2017


+1

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 4:13 AM, Tim Penhey <tim.penhey at canonical.com>
wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> Currently juju will update the status of any hook execution for any unit
> to show that it is busy doing things. This was all well and good until we
> do things based on time.
>
> Every five minutes (or so) each unit will have the update-status hook
> executed to allow the unit to set or update the workload status based on
> what is currently going on with that unit.
>
> Since all hook executions are stored, this means that the show-status-log
> will show the unit jumping from executing update-status to ready and back
> every five minutes.
>
> The proposal is to special case the update-status hook and show in status
> (or the status-log) that the hook is being executed. debug-log will
> continue to show the hook executing if you are looking.
>
> This will reduce noise in the status-log, simplify some of our code around
> dealing with status-log, and reduce load on controllers looking after
> hundreds or thousands of units.
>
> Is anyone opposed to this change?
>
> Tim
>
> --
> Juju-dev mailing list
> Juju-dev at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailm
> an/listinfo/juju-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju-dev/attachments/20170519/6c1d8540/attachment.html>


More information about the Juju-dev mailing list